Breaking News Thread

[glduck]

is this real

and if it is

what the fuck

[glduck]

So how many times would bruin type the word “rug” in a 24 hour period if Obama had invited the Taliban to Camp David over 9/11?

[Scscsc89]

Zero — his head would have exploded way before that 

[Bruin 70]

20 hours ago, Scscsc89 said:

Zero — his head would have exploded way before that 

it would nice if you had one tweetie. Gee how many posts before lefty goes to the tweet. The over and under is 1.

[Orange]

On 9/3/2019 at 5:36 PM, Bruin 70 said:

Please when will Sylvester get tweetie. Now that will be breaking news.

Just FUCKING kill yourself. I'm serious.  Dead serious.

 

Drink bleach.

[Bruin 70]

15 hours ago, Orange said:

Just FUCKING kill yourself. I'm serious.  Dead serious.

 

Drink bleach.

Hey Mustang. The board buster at his best. This really makes new posters want to come on board. The keyboard coward strikes again,

[Bruin 70]

15 hours ago, Orange said:

Just FUCKING kill yourself. I'm serious.  Dead serious.

 

Drink bleach.

Hey Papa any comments for the evil one he is spamming in his own dog crap to protect his clone. LMAO!

[azgreg]

Peace out Bolton.

 

[Bison]

Seems like a good move by Trump and I know most do not like Trump but at the same time he's not answering the cries for more blood spillage from the defense industrial complex.

[glduck]

(Trump hires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

(Trump fires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

[Scscsc89]

It’s amazing that you can give Trump credit for firing Bolton but no criticism for hiring him in the first place.   (Even though he turned out to be the awful appointment everyone he predicted him to be.)

[Scscsc89]

3 minutes ago, glduck said:

(Trump hires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

(Trump fires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

Somehow owned the libs x2

[Bison]

5 minutes ago, Scscsc89 said:

It’s amazing that you can give Trump credit for firing Bolton but no criticism for hiring him in the first place.   (Even though he turned out to be the awful appointment everyone he predicted him to be.)

Think Trump would have been willing to continue the trade war with China without encouragement from Bolton?  Maybe or maybe Bolton wasn't involved with that.

Sounds like Bolton was sacked after leaking the Taliban meetings to the press.

[azgreg]

17 minutes ago, glduck said:

(Trump hires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

(Trump fires Bolton)

Good move by Trump!

To be fair I thought the same thing about our last 4 football coaches.

 

[Bruin 70]

Get rid of the non performers unlike what Obalama did. RE:Lynch

[mysfit]

Zombies eat brains because they don't have any.

 

Somehow, I think the apocalypse has already started and they are among us.....

[Orange]

4 hours ago, Jalapeno said:

Seems like a good move by Trump and I know most do not like Trump but at the same time he's not answering the cries for more blood spillage from the defense industrial complex.

I'mma depart from most of my liberal friends and wander into the unfamiliar territory of mild agreement here.

Whether by accident or on purpose, Trump could have committed thousands of troops and thousands more civilians to their deaths in a military field trip anytime in the past 2 years, and he hasn't.  

Don't get me wrong, I think Trump is one of the most repugnant human beings on the planet, but in this way, he has pleasantly surprised me.

[Bison]

3 hours ago, Orange said:

I'mma depart from most of my liberal friends and wander into the unfamiliar territory of mild agreement here.

Whether by accident or on purpose, Trump could have committed thousands of troops and thousands more civilians to their deaths in a military field trip anytime in the past 2 years, and he hasn't.  

Don't get me wrong, I think Trump is one of the most repugnant human beings on the planet, but in this way, he has pleasantly surprised me.

Having mentioned Bolton who worked under W. Bush...would you have thought W. Bush was smarter than Trump or the other way around?

[Scscsc89]

4 hours ago, Orange said:

I'mma depart from most of my liberal friends and wander into the unfamiliar territory of mild agreement here.

Whether by accident or on purpose, Trump could have committed thousands of troops and thousands more civilians to their deaths in a military field trip anytime in the past 2 years, and he hasn't.  

Don't get me wrong, I think Trump is one of the most repugnant human beings on the planet, but in this way, he has pleasantly surprised me.

I’d agree with this, with the following caveats:

* I don’t think we have a clear picture of what is really happening on the ground in our name in Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Syria/rest of middle east.

* Although the short-term body-count has been thankfully low, I don’t think there’s any question that our national security is much much weaker with regards to Russia, China, NorK, Climate, and “The Cyber”.  

[Orange]

14 hours ago, Scscsc89 said:

I’d agree with this, with the following caveats:

* I don’t think we have a clear picture of what is really happening on the ground in our name in Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Syria/rest of middle east.

* Although the short-term body-count has been thankfully low, I don’t think there’s any question that our national security is much much weaker with regards to Russia, China, NorK, Climate, and “The Cyber”.  

You're definitely right about leaks, cyber warfare, etc.  Perhaps that will lead to blood, but so far it's been bloodless.