Jump to content
WCSBoard

Who is the better ally for the United States   

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the better ally for the United States?



Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:26 AM, BSUTOP25 said:

@AztecAlien, @UtGrizfan, @thelawlorfaithful , and @CoachKenFTW - you guys don’t need to answer, we already know your affections for Russia. I’m curious about the rest of the board.

Considering the EU helped shut down Elections in Romania and banned the Candidate the people voted for twice, arresting people for memes, no free speech, 2 tier justice system in the UK, Canada literally electing their new PM with only 150,000 votes out of a country of 40 Million etc.

Seems like there is little to no difference between the two sides, granted you'd have to have a brain to realize that so I understand if that's asking too much of you.GIF by Tokkingheads

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 6:31 AM, UtGrizfan said:

Considering the EU helped shut down Elections in Romania and banned the Candidate the people voted for twice, arresting people for memes, no free speech, 2 tier justice system in the UK, Canada literally electing their new PM with only 150,000 votes out of a country of 40 Million etc.

Seems like there is no difference between the two sides, granted youd have to have a brain to realize that so I understand if that's asking too much of you.GIF by Tokkingheads

@BSUTOP25 and here I thought your tags were TIC.   

Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 6:31 AM, UtGrizfan said:

Considering the EU helped shut down Elections in Romania and banned the Candidate the people voted for twice, arresting people for memes, no free speech, 2 tier justice system in the UK, Canada literally electing their new PM with only 150,000 votes out of a country of 40 Million etc.

Seems like there is little to no difference between the two sides, granted you'd have to have a brain to realize that so I understand if that's asking too much of you.GIF by Tokkingheads

Romania's Constitutional Court made that decision. The same Constitutional Court annulled Călin Georgescu's candidacy due to electoral irregularities and foreign interference. That decision was made on constitutional and legal grounds within Romania, and your claim is a gross exaggeration.

Nobody is being systematically arrested for posting memes. Laws against hate speech or inciting violence exist, but they are only applied in specific contexts. 

Most EU countries have robust free speech protections, with limitations such as what I mentioned above regarding hate speech laws. These laws are common in democracies around the world and aim to prevent harm, not curtail debate.

The UK wasn't mentioned, as they're not a member of the EU, you dumbass. That said, your claim is incredibly misleading and vastly oversimplified. 

A nationwide popular vote never chooses Canada's Prime Minister; party members select the leader of the ruling party. That's how parliamentary systems work, but I wouldn't expect you to understand concepts more complicated than how to tie your shoes. 

 

  • Like 3
  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 1
  • Idiot 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:51 AM, retrofade said:

Romania's Constitutional Court made that decision. The same Constitutional Court annulled Călin Georgescu's candidacy due to electoral irregularities and foreign interference. That decision was made on constitutional and legal grounds within Romania, and your claim is a gross exaggeration.

Nobody is being systematically arrested for posting memes. Laws against hate speech or inciting violence exist, but they are only applied in specific contexts. 

Most EU countries have robust free speech protections, with limitations such as what I mentioned above regarding hate speech laws. These laws are common in democracies around the world and aim to prevent harm, not curtail debate.

The UK wasn't mentioned, as they're not a member of the EU, you dumbass. That said, your claim is incredibly misleading and vastly oversimplified. 

A nationwide popular vote never chooses Canada's Prime Minister; party members select the leader of the ruling party. That's how parliamentary systems work, but I wouldn't expect you to understand concepts more complicated than how to tie your shoes. 

 

Doing @UtGrizfan a solid by translating your reply for him:

Конституционный суд Румынии принял такое решение. Тот же Конституционный суд аннулировал кандидатуру Кэлина Георгеску из-за нарушений на выборах и иностранного вмешательства. Это решение было принято на конституционных и правовых основаниях в Румынии, и ваше утверждение является грубым преувеличением. Никого не арестовывают систематически за публикацию мемов. Законы против разжигания ненависти или подстрекательства к насилию существуют, но они применяются только в определенных контекстах. В большинстве стран ЕС действуют надежные меры защиты свободы слова с ограничениями, такими как те, о которых я упоминал выше в отношении законов о разжигании ненависти. Эти законы распространены в демократиях по всему миру и направлены на предотвращение вреда, а не на ограничение дебатов. Великобритания не была упомянута, так как она не является членом ЕС, тупица. Тем не менее, ваше утверждение невероятно вводит в заблуждение и значительно упрощено. Общенациональное голосование никогда не выбирает премьер-министра Канады; члены партии выбирают лидера правящей партии. Именно так работают парламентские системы, но я бы не ожидал, что вы поймете концепции, более сложные, чем завязывание шнурков.

  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 10
  • Confused 1
  • Idiot 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 6:51 AM, retrofade said:

Romania's Constitutional Court made that decision. The same Constitutional Court annulled Călin Georgescu's candidacy due to electoral irregularities and foreign interference. That decision was made on constitutional and legal grounds within Romania, and your claim is a gross exaggeration.

Nobody is being systematically arrested for posting memes. Laws against hate speech or inciting violence exist, but they are only applied in specific contexts. 

Most EU countries have robust free speech protections, with limitations such as what I mentioned above regarding hate speech laws. These laws are common in democracies around the world and aim to prevent harm, not curtail debate.

The UK wasn't mentioned, as they're not a member of the EU, you dumbass. That said, your claim is incredibly misleading and vastly oversimplified. 

A nationwide popular vote never chooses Canada's Prime Minister; party members select the leader of the ruling party. That's how parliamentary systems work, but I wouldn't expect you to understand concepts more complicated than how to tie your shoes

 

Seems a little generous doesn’t it? 

Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:56 AM, BSUTOP25 said:

Doing @UtGrizfan a solid by translating your reply for him:

Конституционный суд Румынии принял такое решение. Тот же Конституционный суд аннулировал кандидатуру Кэлина Георгеску из-за нарушений на выборах и иностранного вмешательства. Это решение было принято на конституционных и правовых основаниях в Румынии, и ваше утверждение является грубым преувеличением. Никого не арестовывают систематически за публикацию мемов. Законы против разжигания ненависти или подстрекательства к насилию существуют, но они применяются только в определенных контекстах. В большинстве стран ЕС действуют надежные меры защиты свободы слова с ограничениями, такими как те, о которых я упоминал выше в отношении законов о разжигании ненависти. Эти законы распространены в демократиях по всему миру и направлены на предотвращение вреда, а не на ограничение дебатов. Великобритания не была упомянута, так как она не является членом ЕС, тупица. Тем не менее, ваше утверждение невероятно вводит в заблуждение и значительно упрощено. Общенациональное голосование никогда не выбирает премьер-министра Канады; члены партии выбирают лидера правящей партии. Именно так работают парламентские системы, но я бы не ожидал, что вы поймете концепции, более сложные, чем завязывание шнурков.

Thanks for proving you support Dictators and not Democracy, still waiting on how I magically betrayed the US Constitution by not wanting war like you claimed 😂.

leonardo dicaprio bravo GIF

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:51 AM, retrofade said:

Romania's Constitutional Court made that decision. The same Constitutional Court annulled Călin Georgescu's candidacy due to electoral irregularities and foreign interference. That decision was made on constitutional and legal grounds within Romania, and your claim is a gross exaggeration.

Nobody is being systematically arrested for posting memes. Laws against hate speech or inciting violence exist, but they are only applied in specific contexts. 

Most EU countries have robust free speech protections, with limitations such as what I mentioned above regarding hate speech laws. These laws are common in democracies around the world and aim to prevent harm, not curtail debate.

The UK wasn't mentioned, as they're not a member of the EU, you dumbass. That said, your claim is incredibly misleading and vastly oversimplified. 

A nationwide popular vote never chooses Canada's Prime Minister; party members select the leader of the ruling party. That's how parliamentary systems work, but I wouldn't expect you to understand concepts more complicated than how to tie your shoes. 

 

Keep on justifying bullshit behavior, "hate speech" is subjective" and funny enough it always knly goes one way. And the UK is apart of NATO dumbass 

Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:01 AM, UtGrizfan said:

Keep on justifying bullshit behavior,  and the UK is apart of NATO dumbass 

My bad on the UK then, but it was still a gross exaggeration on your part.

I'm not justifying anything, I explained quite clearly how you're a complete fucking moron, and that's what you come back with. Brilliant. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Idiot 3
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:00 AM, UtGrizfan said:

Thanks for proving you support Dictators and not Democracy, still waiting on how I magically betrayed the US Constitution by not wanting war like you claimed 😂.

leonardo dicaprio bravo GIF

@BSUTOP25 seems to have a strong dislike for United States veterans like you.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 8:03 AM, retrofade said:

My bad on the UK then, but it was still a gross exaggeration on your part.

I'm not justifying anything, I explained quite clearly how you're a complete fucking moron, and that's what you come back with. Brilliant. 

 

Nah you're justifying bullshit, if you think arresting people over a meme or daring to criticize a politician is hate speech or claiming a political opponent is a "fOrIeGn AgEnT" because they won an election TWICE is a form of Democacy then you're a special kind of stupid.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:06 AM, UtGrizfan said:

Nah you're justifying bullshit, if you think arresting people over a meme or daring to criticize a politician is hate speech or claiming a political opponent is a "fOrIeGn AgEnT" because they won an election TWICE is a form of Democacy then you're a special kind of stupid.

I haven't justified anything, you mouthbreathing ignoramous. I explained how and why you're a goddamned fucking moron. 

  • Idiot 4
Posted

Again with the veteran bullying. Why do you warmongering liberals hate the veterans who do your dirty work for you?

Is it because they've suffered real trauma? Whereas you've had to manufacture yours?

  • Like 2
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 8:04 AM, CoachKenFTW said:

@BSUTOP25 seems to have a strong dislike for United States veterans like you.

Like you, he turned his back on the constitution and swore to preserve, protect and defend Krasnov. 

  • Cheers 1
  • Idiot 4
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 8:10 AM, retrofade said:

I haven't justified anything, you mouthbreathing ignoramous. I explained how and why you're a goddamned fucking moron. 

You think arresting people over memes and the EU directly interfering and denying the Canidate the people in Romania voted for twice is a form of Democacy and I'm the moron? 😂 sit down Will Ferrell Comedy GIF by filmeditor

  • Cheers 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 8:13 AM, BSUTOP25 said:

Like you, he turned his back on the constitution and swore to preserve, protect and defend Krasnov. 

Please explain how? Because I don't support Zelensky or the behavior of NATO/EU Nations that magically means I support Putin and somehow at the same time means I don't support the United States and invalidated the oath I took?

Like I get it, you're a TDS ridden moron but man hopefully you didn't break something due to reaching so hard. You hate veterans or anyone with a different opinion, we get it, you're a piece of shit.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 3/12/2025 at 7:13 AM, BSUTOP25 said:

Like you, he turned his back on the constitution and swore to preserve, protect and defend Krasnov. 

There isn't an amendment in the constitution that requirements agreement with internet incels like you. Yet.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...