AztecAlien Posted February 3 Author Posted February 3 On 2/3/2025 at 2:59 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: Al Jazeera has lost pretty much all credibility the past 8 years as it has transformed into a mouth piece for radical Islamic Terror. It has the same factual reporting rating as Breitbart. Their main headquarters are in Doha Qatar. USA, NYC. Quote
InnZoneU Posted February 4 Posted February 4 On 2/2/2025 at 11:17 PM, SWspartan said: Reuters US News & World Report KNX Newsradio AM 1070/FM 97.1 Sky News That's a good list. The problem is. Real, hard "just the news' is boring AF. And Americans don't do boring. News is now entertainment. Quote
CPslograd Posted February 4 Posted February 4 In regards to TV I like the early show on CNBC, with the blonde jewish chic, the two different eye colors democrat dude, and the 70 year old blonde republican Joe. And I still like to see Brit's takes on Baer's show. Quote
azgreg Posted February 4 Posted February 4 On 2/3/2025 at 1:59 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: Al Jazeera has lost pretty much all credibility the past 8 years as it has transformed into a mouth piece for radical Islamic Terror. It was posted tongue in cheek. lately I've found myself following more independent journalists. 1 1 Quote
AztecAlien Posted February 5 Author Posted February 5 On 2/4/2025 at 7:47 PM, Billings said: AP and Reuters. perhaps BBC Reuters went to a paywall. Quote
Billings Posted February 5 Posted February 5 On 2/4/2025 at 6:51 PM, AztecAlien said: Reuters went to a paywall. and I pay. People don't work for free 1 Quote
AztecAlien Posted February 5 Author Posted February 5 On 2/4/2025 at 8:04 PM, Billings said: and I pay. People don't work for free BBC is still free. 1 Quote
CPslograd Posted February 5 Posted February 5 On 2/4/2025 at 7:05 PM, AztecAlien said: BBC is still free. The problem with the free sites, like Fox, CNN and the rest, is theyve become clickbait. They arent even trying to tell news, theyre just trying to generate clicks. So they pander to the radical that will click on every hot button issue of the day, instead of writing hard news or insightful commentary. 1 Quote
Billings Posted February 5 Posted February 5 On 2/4/2025 at 8:10 PM, CPslograd said: The problem with the free sites, like Fox, CNN and the rest, is theyve become clickbait. They arent even trying to tell news, theyre just trying to generate clicks. So they pander to the radical that will click on every hot button issue of the day, instead of writing hard news or insightful commentary. gotta pay the bills and keep the lights on ya know 1 Quote
bornontheblue Posted February 7 Posted February 7 On 2/4/2025 at 9:10 PM, CPslograd said: The problem with the free sites, like Fox, CNN and the rest, is theyve become clickbait. They arent even trying to tell news, theyre just trying to generate clicks. Quote
AlpineSummer Posted February 7 Posted February 7 All commercial media has the inherent structural problem of their own commercial interests. Quote
bornontheblue Posted February 7 Posted February 7 On 2/7/2025 at 1:19 PM, AlpineSummer said: All commercial media has the inherent structural problem of their own commercial interests. Some are much worse than others Quote
Akkula Posted February 9 Posted February 9 On 2/3/2025 at 8:13 PM, 406bleedsblue said: Rachel Maddow The MSNBC hosts are biased but they are also highly factual and have solid research and sources about what they choose to cover. Fox News hosts are highly biased the other way. The difference is they just make up a lot, feed conspiracy theories, and make assertions based sensational or prejudicial information with little factual support. You can say Maddow is biased but saying her stories are not REALLY well researched isn't really something you can say, I don't think. If she draws some conclusion she painstakingly shows the evidence. Almost to a fault where she gets so far into the weeds. Her supposed failed fact checks over her career may not be a many are spewed on a typical Hannity segment as you can see below https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rachel-maddow-bias-rating-2/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hannity-com/ 2 Quote
406bleedsblue Posted Tuesday at 08:15 PM Posted Tuesday at 08:15 PM On 2/9/2025 at 4:19 AM, Akkula said: The MSNBC hosts are biased but they are also highly factual and have solid research and sources about what they choose to cover. Fox News hosts are highly biased the other way. The difference is they just make up a lot, feed conspiracy theories, and make assertions based sensational or prejudicial information with little factual support. You can say Maddow is biased but saying her stories are not REALLY well researched isn't really something you can say, I don't think. If she draws some conclusion she painstakingly shows the evidence. Almost to a fault where she gets so far into the weeds. Her supposed failed fact checks over her career may not be a many are spewed on a typical Hannity segment as you can see below https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rachel-maddow-bias-rating-2/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/hannity-com/ Quote
Hashbrowns Posted Wednesday at 02:08 AM Posted Wednesday at 02:08 AM This is an interesting aggregator concept. https://ground.news/ Shows coverage L/R biases. Quote
Hashbrowns Posted Wednesday at 02:13 AM Posted Wednesday at 02:13 AM On 2/3/2025 at 4:04 PM, InnZoneU said: "just the news' is boring AF” Just the news: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events Quote
azgreg Posted Wednesday at 01:15 PM Posted Wednesday at 01:15 PM Interesting take on the possible coming boom of independent journalism. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DF6nxGrJJdR/?utm_source=ig_web_button_share_sheet&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== https://www.instagram.com/reel/DF6oJrLJk6c/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.