Jump to content
WCSBoard

Recommended Posts

Posted

A U.S. Air Force veteran believes he was involved in the recovery of alien technology while working for a long-rumored secret UFO retrieval program.

In an exclusive interview with NewsNation, whistleblower Jake Barber said he has contracted as a helicopter pilot to retrieve all kinds of downed craft, some of which he believes are of nonhuman origin.

“Just visually looking at the object on the ground, you could tell that it was extraordinary and anomalous,” Barber told NewsNation’s Ross Coulthart. “It was not human.”

When asked to describe the object, Barber said: “I saw an egg, a white egg.”

He added: “It’s inconsistent with anything I’d ever seen before. I can also tell you that the reaction by my team, we all knew we were dealing with something extraordinary.”

Other whstleblowers, including Lue Elizondo and David Grusch, have alleged a secret government UFO program exists but Barber says he knows it’s true because he’s part of it.

“Over the last couple years, it’s been confirmed to me by ranking members of the UAP task force that what we were working with that night was, in fact, NHI (nonhuman intelligence) and it was not a unique experience,” Barber said.

Three high-level military veterans are backing up Barber’s story, on the record and on-camera to NewsNation.

NewsNation has also obtained exclusive, never-before-seen video of one of these alleged UFO crash retrievals. That video and the full interviews will air in Saturday’s special report “Hunting UFOs: The Crash Retrieval Whistleblower” at 8p/7c.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/ufo/uap-whistleblower-ufo-retrieval-program/

  • Like 2
Posted
On 1/15/2025 at 9:16 PM, retrofade said:

A U.S. Air Force veteran believes he was involved in the recovery of alien technology while working for a long-rumored secret UFO retrieval program.

In an exclusive interview with NewsNation, whistleblower Jake Barber said he has contracted as a helicopter pilot to retrieve all kinds of downed craft, some of which he believes are of nonhuman origin.

“Just visually looking at the object on the ground, you could tell that it was extraordinary and anomalous,” Barber told NewsNation’s Ross Coulthart. “It was not human.”

When asked to describe the object, Barber said: “I saw an egg, a white egg.”

He added: “It’s inconsistent with anything I’d ever seen before. I can also tell you that the reaction by my team, we all knew we were dealing with something extraordinary.”

Other whstleblowers, including Lue Elizondo and David Grusch, have alleged a secret government UFO program exists but Barber says he knows it’s true because he’s part of it.

“Over the last couple years, it’s been confirmed to me by ranking members of the UAP task force that what we were working with that night was, in fact, NHI (nonhuman intelligence) and it was not a unique experience,” Barber said.

Three high-level military veterans are backing up Barber’s story, on the record and on-camera to NewsNation.

NewsNation has also obtained exclusive, never-before-seen video of one of these alleged UFO crash retrievals. That video and the full interviews will air in Saturday’s special report “Hunting UFOs: The Crash Retrieval Whistleblower” at 8p/7c.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/space/ufo/uap-whistleblower-ufo-retrieval-program/

mork_egg.jpg

  • Cheers 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 12:27 PM, The San Diegan said:

Strawman. Let me finish catching up with work and I'll circle back around to this.

I watched an episode of Joe Rogan with Dr Brian Cox.  I am fully informed on this topic. 

 

  • Haha 2
Posted
On 1/17/2025 at 6:21 AM, bornontheblue said:

We are alone in the universe. 

Or at least alone in the universe that can be possible explored by us , or others that could possible get to us, 

fight me @halfmanhalfbronco

I mostly agree with you, the evidence is really low and for some reason all the "best" evidence only takes place in the US out of the whole world.

Anyways, not going to argue in this thread but I'll read you're guy's back and forths with 🍿 .

  • Cheers 1
Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 12:52 PM, StealthLobo said:

I mostly agree with you, the evidence is really low and for some reason all the "best" evidence only takes place in the US out of the whole world.

Anyways, not going to argue in this thread but I'll read you're guy's back and forths with 🍿 .

Let me revise. I don't think we are alone in the universe. The probability of life out there has got to be pretty high.  I just don't think that a civilization will ever advance far enough without destroying itself to develop the technology to travel among star systems. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 11:34 AM, bornontheblue said:

I watched an episode of Joe Rogan with Dr Brian Cox.  I am fully informed on this topic. 

Right on. I'm making use of Siri for dictation and should probably proof read this before posting*, but fuck it. We're going Gonzo... So strap in - or strap on, if that's your thing. :ph34r:

Please forgive me if this rings familiar, as I know I've posted this sentiment before. I am a mathematician whose area of specialization was number theory and set theory. In number theory, one of the many proofs you have to perform is to prove that prime numbers occur infinitely in the field of integers. As I’m sure you can understand, the larger the integer, the more likely it is to be the product of prime factors. So the larger the integer, the smaller the probability that it is a prime number. And when you get to integers that are tens of digits in length that associated probability becomes infinitesimally small (In case you’re wondering, this is all relevant in the field of cryptography). 

The gist of the proof is to demonstrate that because the field of integers is infinite in its size, prime numbers occur infinitely as well.

Similarly, due to the infinite scale size of the universe (infinite for all intents and purposes), no matter how small the probability of even microbial life organically occurring elsewhere in the universe, it becomes axiomatic that not just life, but intelligent life is abundant in the universe as well. And when you consider that the most recent estimated by astronomers is that there are 20 billion earth-like planets just in the Milky Way alone, and that present estimates for the number of galaxies in the universe (extrapolated from the number of observed galaxies) ranges from 100 billion on the low end to 2 trillion on the high end, the estimated number of exoplanets capable of sustaining life is absolutely staggering - in the billions of billions (2x10^21 on the low end). So even an infinitesimally small probability of life occurring organically on another planet - say .0000000000000001 - that means there are a minimum of 2 million planets in this universe harboring life. Now let's move the arbitrary needle just a little. Let's assume the high estimate of 2 trillion galaxies and set the probability of life organically originating on a given en earth-like planet to .0000000001 and the number of planets harboring life jumps to 4 trillion

One can also approach this line of thought by considering the relatively short time span in which we have been relevant on this planet as a species. Think about how far we have advanced technologically in just the last 150 years of our existence. Imagine where we will be 1,000, or 10,000 years from now. Now, consider that other nonhuman intelligences may have had a jumpstart of not thousands, but rather millions of years ahead of us - where might they be technologically?

As far as how those technologies may enable travel over great distances beyond our scale or scope of understanding, consider that nearly a quarter-century ago, researchers in Australia successfully teleported subatomic particles. And while this technology (in the pubic sphere) had advanced to the point where we will likely realize quantum communication within the next five years or so (I'm guessing this already exists), where messages travel instantaneously, i.e., at FTL speed. Also, advances just within the last month in the field of quantum computing provide evidentiary support of the hypothesized existence of multiple universes. So imagine what we will learn and accomplish in the next 150 years (provided we last that long). How is this relevant, or what are the implications of this as a pertains to this discussion? Fuck if I know. But reread the paragraph above this one and then revisit this one and let your mind ponder the subject as mine does on a regular basis. 

I also think we have to take into consideration the sheer volume of reported sightings that have been reported, collected, and studied over the years, many from individuals qualified in their capabilities to identify aircraft.
 
For what it’s worth, I believe at least 95% of reported sightings are in fact attributed to something of entirely mundane and earthly origin, e.g., aircraft, drones, balloons, stars, etc. Now consider an organization like NUFORC, that has been around since 1974 - over a half century. And in that time they have collected reports of over 90,000 UFO sightings. Now let’s say instead of my figure of 95%, we assume that 99% can be attributed to conventional sources. That would still directly imply that nearly 1000 of those sightings were of something truly anomalous. And that's just in that one database.
 
Btw, the only reason you see an overrepresentation of reported sightings in the US is due to the fact it has been a topic of interest within our culture for nearly 80 years, while only a subject of serious interest to (most of) the global community for the last twenty years or so. There are plenty of exceptions to this of course, with a large number of reported sightings throughout both North and South America (per capita sightings in Brazil, Mexico, and Costa Rica are on par with the US). Similarly, since the subject has become an area of interest in the rest of the world, you see the number of reported sightings on the rise throughout Asia and Europe as well.
 
Now qualitatively inspect those reports. As mentioned, a significant number were submitted or reported by people more qualified than most civilians (e.g., commercial and military pilots). 
 
Speaking of which, a close friend of my father who served in the Air Force with him worked on Project Blue Book. All he’d ever say about his time working on Project Blue Book (to this day - I've asked him probably 4-5 times over the decades) was that a vast majority of sightings were attributed to mundane and earthly explanations. But he always let that hang out there to provide the same inference I suggest above. I guess I should also mention that in addition to serving together at Peterson attached to Space Command, my old man’s duty stations also included Sunnyvale (where USAF intelligence is headquartered). While he never witnessed anything firsthand himself as a pilot, he had been present when there were observed radar sightings while stationed at both Peterson AFB and Sunnyvale, and knew a pilot who had a sighting firsthand (a Thud driver who witnessed a cigar-shaped UFO in Vietnam) . Of course, all that shit is allegorical and in my opinion holds far less water than the probabilistic argument I’ve presented above.
 
In short, I think there is overwhelming evidence to support not just the existence of NHI, but of frequent visitation by the same.
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Fuck going Gonzo. Proof read it after all and just wasted the last 15 minutes correcting a shitton of Siri mistakes.
Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 1:52 PM, The San Diegan said:

Right on. I'm making use of Siri for dictation and should probably proof read this before posting, but fuck it. We're going Gonzo... So strap in - or strap on, if that's your thing. :ph34r:

Please forgive me if this rings familiar, as I know I've posted this sentiment before. I am a mathematician whose area of specialization was number theory and set theory. In number theory, one of the many proofs you have to perform is to prove that prime numbers occur infinitely in the field of integers. As I’m sure you can understand, the larger the integer, the more likely it is to be the product of prime factors. So the larger the integer, the smaller the probability that it is a prime number. And when you get to integers that are tens of digits in length that associated probability becomes infinitesimally small (In case you’re wondering, this is all relevant in the field of cryptography). 

The gist of the proof is to demonstrate that because the field of integers is infinite in its size, prime numbers occur infinitely as well.

Similarly, due to the infinite scale size of the universe (infinite for all intents and purposes), no matter how small the probability of even microbial life organically occurring elsewhere in the universe, it becomes axiomatic that not just life, but intelligent life is abundant in the universe as well.

One can also approach this line of thought by considering the relatively short time span in which we have been relevant on this planet as a species. Think about how far we have advanced technologically in just the last 150 years of our existence. Imagine where we will be 1,000, or 10,000 years from now. Now, consider that other nonhuman intelligences may have had a jumpstart of not thousands, but rather millions of years ahead of us - where might they be technologically?

As far as how those technologies may enable travel over great distances beyond our scale or scope of understanding, consider that nearly a quarter-century ago, researchers in Australia successfully teleported subatomic particles. And while this technology (in the pubic sphere) had advanced to the point where we will likely realize quantum communication within the next five years or so (I'm guessing this already exists), where messages travel instantaneously, i.e., at FTL speed. Also, advances just within the last month in the field of quantum computing provide evidentiary support of the hypothesized existence of multiple universes. So imagine what we will learn and accomplish in the next 150 years (provided we last that long). How is this relevant, or what are the implications of this as a pertains to this discussion? Fuck if I know. But reread the paragraph above this one and then revisit this one and let your mind ponder the subject as mine does on a regular basis. 

I also think we have to take into consideration the sheer volume of reported sightings that have been reported, collected, and studied over the years, many from individuals qualified in their capabilities to identify aircraft.
 
For what it’s worth, I believe at least 95% of reported sightings are in fact attributed to something of entirely mundane and earthly origin, e.g., aircraft, drones, balloons, stars, etc. Now consider an organization like NUFORC, that has been around since 1974 - over a half century. And in that time they have collected reports of over 90,000 UFO sightings. Now let’s say instead of my figure of 95%, we assume that 99% can be attributed to conventional sources. That would still directly imply that nearly 1000 of those sightings were of something truly anomalous. And the only reason you see an overrepresentation of reported sightings in the US is due to the fact it has been a topic of interest within our culture for nearly 80 years, while only a subject of serious interest to (most of) the global community for the last twenty years or so. There are plenty of exceptions to this of course, with a large number of reported sightings throughout both North and South America (per capita sightings in Brazil, Mexico, and Costa Rica are on par with the US). Similarly, since the subject has become an area of interest in the rest of the world, you see the number of reported sightings on the rise throughout Asia and Europe as well.
 
Now qualitatively inspect those reports. As mentioned, a significant number were submitted or reported by people more qualified than most civilians (e.g., commercial and military pilots). 
 
Speaking of which, a close friend of my father who served in the Air Force with him worked on Project Blue Book. All he’d ever say about his time working on Project Blue Book (to this day - I've asked him probably 4-5 times over the decades) was that a vast majority of sightings were attributed to mundane and earthly explanations. But he always let that hang out there to provide the same inference I suggest above. I guess I should also mention that in addition to serving together at Peterson attached to Space Command, my old man’s duty stations also included Sunnyvale (where USAF intelligence is headquartered). While he never witnessed anything firsthand himself as a pilot, he had been present when there were observed radar sightings while stationed at both Peterson AFB and Sunnyvale, and knew a pilot who had a sighting firsthand (a Thud driver who witnessed a cigar-shaped UFO in Vietnam) . Of course, all that shit is allegorical and in my opinion holds far less water than the probabilistic argument I’ve presented above.
 
In short, I think there is overwhelming evidence to support not just the existence of NHI, but of frequent visitation by the same.

Have you heard of the Great Filter explanation to the Fermi Paradox?  Basically that they are numerous and many impossible hurdles to overcome to advance technology far enough for travel between different planetary systems. Things like a civilization annihilating itself. 

We are a very young solar system and if other star systems haver had millions of years head start on us they should have colonized the milky way by now? Well Where are they? 

Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 1:01 PM, bornontheblue said:

Have you heard of the Great Filter explanation to the Fermi Paradox?  Basically that they are numerous and many impossible hurdles to overcome to advance technology far enough for travel between different planetary systems. Things like a civilization annihilating itself. 

We are a very young solar system and if other star systems haver had millions of years head start on us they should have colonized the milky way by now? Well Where are they? 

Not by name necessarily but the concept is familiar to me. 

As far as where they are? First as mentioned, that's a strawman argument. Did radio waves exist before we discovered them? What about germs? Cells? Atoms? Black holes?

Second, according to highly-trained military personnel observing this shit all over creation for nearly a century now, I'd say they're pretty much everywhere:shrug: 

 

Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 2:06 PM, The San Diegan said:

Not by name necessarily but the concept is familiar to me. 

As far as where they are? First as mentioned, that's a straw man argument. Did radio waves exist before a centc we discovered them? What about germs? Cells? Atoms? Black holes?

Second, according to highly-trained military personnel observing this shit all over creation for nearly a century now, I'd say they're pretty much everywhere:shrug: 

 

As far as them being here already I’m not going to buy that without more solid and verifiable evidence. Grainy videos and strange phenomena are not going to cut it for me. 
 

I want tangible , verifiable evidence. Maybe we already have it but it’s kept secret 🤷‍♂️ 

Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 2:06 PM, The San Diegan said:

Not by name necessarily but the concept is familiar to me. 

As far as where they are? First as mentioned, that's a strawman argument. Did radio waves exist before we discovered them? What about germs? Cells? Atoms? Black holes?

Second, according to highly-trained military personnel observing this shit all over creation for nearly a century now, I'd say they're pretty much everywhere:shrug: 

 

 

Posted
On 1/16/2025 at 1:10 PM, bornontheblue said:

As far as them being here already I’m not going to buy that without more solid and verifiable evidence. Grainy videos and strange phenomena are not going to cut it for me. 
 

I want tangible , verifiable evidence. Maybe we already have it but it’s kept secret 🤷‍♂️ 

You mean like people providing sworn testimony both in front of Congress and by way of sworn affidavit? Like multi-spectrum instrument captures (i.e., visible, infrared, radar, et al) by military personnel that coincide with firsthand sightings, by both aviators and land- and sea-based personnel? Yeah, there's a metric fuckton of these (and far more from the civilian sphere which I am disregarding for the sake of focusing on individuals more qualified than most to assess and evaluate their own experiences). 

Do you want them to bring you a glass of warm milk while they show these to you, too? 😀

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...