InnZoneU Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 9:46 AM, AztecAlien said: The irony is inn the zone. Chuggin along. Keep it going troll boi. 1 1 Quote
AztecAlien Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 10:47 AM, InnZoneU said: Chuggin along. Keep it going troll boi. Your escape plan isn't working out so well for you. Lol. Quote
InnZoneU Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 9:48 AM, AztecAlien said: Your escape plan isn't working out so well for you. Lol. LOL if you think 4 fat fuck incels are going to break me, you're not very on point. Aztex got his little gang going on now lmfao. 1 2 Quote
AztecAlien Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 10:50 AM, InnZoneU said: LOL if you think 4 fat fuck incels are going to break me, you're not very on point. And who exactly are you breaking? Lol Quote
InnZoneU Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 Chuggin along with the troll thing. It's all you do. Get a fucking life Alien. Nobody here respects you. 1 1 Quote
AztecAlien Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 10:54 AM, InnZoneU said: Chuggin along with the troll thing. It's all you do. Get a fucking life Alien. Nobody here respects you. Hey, Mr. Respect, I thought you escaped me. Lol. Quote
Slapdad Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 11:45 AM, InnZoneU said: You seem exactly like the type of fucking loser who monitors posts. Get a fucking life bro. It looks like I caught the quad of stupid in this thread. Hilarious. They'll keep going until I quit. If by monitor, you mean that I can see, then yes. I can see that you're a huge baby......bro. Quit crying and STFU. 1 Quote
Sactowndog Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 8:11 AM, Slapdad said: Good Lord, the lengths that you'll go to in order to fight for an absurd woke stance is crazy. You realize that stuff like this is at least partially to blame for Kamala losing, right? I hope its worth it. Who is fighting for a woke stance. I am only trying to find a fair stance for all participants and realize nothing is simple particularly at the upper levels of sports. I have had 2 kids and 2 children in law complete at the D1 collegiate and/or international level. How many have you had? Quote
Sactowndog Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 8:47 AM, Slapdad said: You earned an "idiot" reaction from InnZoneU for you post (as did I).....I'm shocked! But you're correct. As the Mount Sinai website points out: "Klinefelter syndrome, also called 47,XXY, is a genetic condition that occurs in males when they have an extra X chromosome."....this isn't that difficult. Sure but the standard offered by BYU was they have two XX chromosomes which XXY people do. the point is this shit isn’t so simple because yes they are genetic anomalies but it is often those with genetic anomalies that filter to the highest levels of sport. Not all women have the same testosterone levels in the body. Here is an interesting article on the subject. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2019/02/08/testosterone-limits-female-athletes-based-flawed-science#:~:text=Most females have testosterone levels,testosterone levels%2C according to IAAF. Quote
Slapdad Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 12:31 PM, Sactowndog said: Who is fighting for a woke stance. I am only trying to find a fair stance for all participants and realize nothing is simple particularly at the upper levels of sports. I have had 2 kids and 2 children in law complete at the D1 collegiate and/or international level. How many have you had? That's a dumb argument. Does having kids in collegiate sports make you any sort of expert on what a woman is? No, of course not. And you're not trying to find a fair stance, you're doing everything you can to argue that a man is a now a woman. 1 Quote
Slapdad Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 12:41 PM, InnZoneU said: LMFAOOOO. Are you monitoring me? Weirdo! 1 Quote
AztecAlien Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 11:43 AM, Slapdad said: Are you monitoring me? Weirdo! Irony 1 1 Quote
Slapdad Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 12:46 PM, AztecAlien said: Irony The funny thing is that it was such a predictable result. 1 1 Quote
happycamper Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/2/2024 at 3:53 PM, BYUcougfan said: XX chromosomes. Again, basic biology. what about xxx chromosomes? or swyer syndrome? Quote
AztecAlien Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 11:47 AM, Slapdad said: The funny thing is that it was such a predictable result. That was only about half. Then I got this. Quote
Sactowndog Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 10:42 AM, Slapdad said: That's a dumb argument. Does having kids in collegiate sports make you any sort of expert on what a woman is? No, of course not. And you're not trying to find a fair stance, you're doing everything you can to argue that a man is a now a woman. No I’m saying picking an attribute and logically using it to say “that” is a woman is both illogical, impractical and basically dumb. Again you can logically say all people who can give birth are women. You cannot say all women can give birth. It’s both wrong and ignorant. But ignorance seems to be the stock in trade for your side. Ideally you pick some measurable standard relative to athletic performance, testosterone levels or something else, and that is your dividing line. 3 Quote
InnZoneU Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 10:43 AM, Slapdad said: Are you monitoring me? Weirdo! You don't get the joke. Not surprised. Now go back to yer RA duties. I heard Tucker down the hallway has some weed. Go. 1 Quote
bornontheblue Posted December 3, 2024 Posted December 3, 2024 On 12/3/2024 at 11:41 AM, Sactowndog said: Sure but the standard offered by BYU was they have two XX chromosomes which XXY people do. the point is this shit isn’t so simple because yes they are genetic anomalies but it is often those with genetic anomalies that filter to the highest levels of sport. Not all women have the same testosterone levels in the body. Here is an interesting article on the subject. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2019/02/08/testosterone-limits-female-athletes-based-flawed-science#:~:text=Most females have testosterone levels,testosterone levels%2C according to IAAF. You are purposely convoluting the topic to avoid answering a simple question because it might make the MAGAS win. Quit being dumb Also yes, many top level elite athletes have genetics to thank for their abilities, but that is not a deformity. That is being on the far right side of the bell curve of normal genetic distributions. Even these people can be clearly delineated as either a woman or a man. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.