mugtang Posted Friday at 09:02 PM Posted Friday at 09:02 PM On 11/29/2024 at 12:58 PM, Slapdad said: He didn't dox them, he reposted a Tweet by the datahazard account, which appears to bill itself as some sort of government watchdog account. Musk retweeting it will put significantly more eyes on it, but 1) he did not "dox" anyone and 2) Under open government laws specified in 5 U.S.C. § 552, the names, titles, and salaries of all civilian government employees are considered public information, so the original post is not doxxing either. Had a personal address, phone number or email been included, then that would be a different story. Does it suck...yes, but that comes with the territory when you're a government employee...especially higher up the food chain. How dare you question or correct my talking points.
Slapdad Posted Friday at 09:04 PM Posted Friday at 09:04 PM On 11/29/2024 at 3:02 PM, mugtang said: How dare you question or correct my talking points. I'm not questioning them, I'm just telling you they're wrong. Big difference.
thelawlorfaithful Posted Friday at 09:53 PM Posted Friday at 09:53 PM On 11/29/2024 at 12:58 PM, Slapdad said: He didn't dox them, he reposted a Tweet by the datahazard account, which appears to bill itself as some sort of government watchdog account. Musk retweeting it will put significantly more eyes on it, but 1) he did not "dox" anyone and 2) Under open government laws specified in 5 U.S.C. § 552, the names, titles, and salaries of all civilian government employees are considered public information, so the original post is not doxxing either. Had a personal address, phone number or email been included, then that would be a different story. Does it suck...yes, but that comes with the territory when you're a government employee...especially higher up the food chain. And the posted CNN article directs to the same tweet for anyone who is actually upset about this sort of thing, which is nobody. 1
halfmanhalfbronco Posted Friday at 11:16 PM Posted Friday at 11:16 PM On 11/29/2024 at 2:53 PM, thelawlorfaithful said: And the posted CNN article directs to the same tweet for anyone who is actually upset about this sort of thing, which is nobody. It's just more faux outrage about things he doesn't understand by @Sactowndog 1
Sactowndog Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM Author Posted yesterday at 12:05 AM On 11/29/2024 at 1:58 PM, Slapdad said: He didn't dox them, he reposted a Tweet by the datahazard account, which appears to bill itself as some sort of government watchdog account. Musk retweeting it will put significantly more eyes on it, but 1) he did not "dox" anyone and 2) Under open government laws specified in 5 U.S.C. § 552, the names, titles, and salaries of all civilian government employees are considered public information, so the original post is not doxxing either. Had a personal address, phone number or email been included, then that would be a different story. Does it suck...yes, but that comes with the territory when you're a government employee...especially higher up the food chain. Sure he didn’t Dox them but he didn’t direct multiple of his fan boys like HMHB to harass them. If Elon wants to recommend cuts he might want to stop being a dick as to truly cut them requires Congressional approval.
retrofade Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM Posted yesterday at 12:23 AM On 11/29/2024 at 3:16 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: It's just more faux outrage about things he doesn't understand by @Sactowndog Sactown didn't say that Elmo doxxed them. He said that Elmo targeted them individually, which is accurate.
halfmanhalfbronco Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM Posted yesterday at 01:41 AM On 11/29/2024 at 5:23 PM, retrofade said: Sactown didn't say that Elmo doxxed them. He said that Elmo targeted them individually, which is accurate. Most people don't get a several months advanced notice they could be fired. I think he did them a favor. Time for these useless bureaucrats to update their LinkedIn. 2 1
RSF Posted yesterday at 02:34 AM Posted yesterday at 02:34 AM According to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, the standard advance notice period for layoffs is 60 days for employers with 100 or more employees planning a mass layoff or plant closure; meaning they must provide written notice to affected employees at least 60 days before the layoff takes effect 2
Wyobraska Posted yesterday at 06:50 AM Posted yesterday at 06:50 AM How is it legal for someone like Musk who's companies suck so much money from the Federal Teat be allowed to decide anything financially related to the government? 3
SharkTanked Posted yesterday at 02:56 PM Posted yesterday at 02:56 PM On 11/29/2024 at 6:34 PM, RSF said: According to the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, the standard advance notice period for layoffs is 60 days for employers with 100 or more employees planning a mass layoff or plant closure; meaning they must provide written notice to affected employees at least 60 days before the layoff takes effect Their stated goal is to get as many as possible to quit on their own so they don't have to worry about that. They did announce a healthy severance package. Musk's implied goal is likely to maximize his own business profit by steering as much government money as possible towards his contracts.
SalinasSpartan Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago So is DOGE actually going to be a department? Or are they just going to be consultants and the name is strictly for the lulz?
azgreg Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago On 11/30/2024 at 11:55 AM, SalinasSpartan said: So is DOGE actually going to be a department? That's up to Congress.
Chile_Ute Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago On 11/30/2024 at 6:28 PM, azgreg said: That's up to Congress. …so it will be eventually.
PokeTransplant Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago On 11/30/2024 at 6:12 PM, Chile_Ute said: …so it will be eventually. not enough time. looking at a 18 month window to actually get anything started. the mid-terms will decide if anything tertiary actually gets through
Chile_Ute Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago On 11/30/2024 at 8:49 PM, PokeTransplant said: not enough time. looking at a 18 month window to actually get anything started. the mid-terms will decide if anything tertiary actually gets through Not entirely convinced that there isn’t some back door fast track that suddenly appears. We’ll see.
SalinasSpartan Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago On 11/30/2024 at 5:28 PM, azgreg said: That's up to Congress. What I meant was, I wonder if they are actually planning on trying to make this a department? Or, was this envisioned as a commission from the start and the “department” in the name was just branding?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now