stanfordchef Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 8:49 PM, UtGrizfan said: Then why wasn't he convicted? You're literally claiming something when there was 0 conviction despite an investigation. I mean Michael Jackson fucked hella kids but he never was convicted. Do you think the King of Pop fucked kids? Do you think OJ killed his wife and Rollie Fingers Goldmans kid? He was never convicted of either after all.
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 9:57 PM, stanfordchef said: I mean Michael Jackson fucked hella kids but he never was convicted. Do you think the King of Pop fucked kids? Do you think OJ killed his wife and Rollie Fingers Goldmans kid? He was never convicted of either after all. Sounds pretty conspiratorial, interesting considering how you and others have acted about other topics presented on here. If there is concrete proof he did anything then fuck that guy, however a literal investigation from a DOJ that was by no means friendly to him or MAGA in general didn't convict him, in fact they did the opposite.
retrofade Posted November 22 Author Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 9:00 PM, UtGrizfan said: Sounds pretty conspiratorial, interesting considering how you and others have acted about other topics presented on here. If there is concrete proof he did anything then fuck that guy, however a literal investigation from a DOJ that was by no means friendly to him or MAGA in general didn't convict him, in fact they did the opposite. *whiny victim noises* 1 1
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 10:31 PM, retrofade said: *whiny victim noises* As usual upset by facts with no argument, not surprising 🥱
happycamper Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 6:36 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: IMO that's not a monopoly. That is making a platform friendly to old people. Young people don't like it. They get their fix elsewhere. It's a unique platform but it's not a necessity or the only gateway to online social networking in a time feed manor. haflman, they are and were such a monopoly, they were the only real avenue for web entertainment sites, and made the entire industry crash for their own reasons. That's' a monopoly. On 11/21/2024 at 6:36 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: And let's look at the Google Search engine. AI is about to collapse that "monopoly". When you can ask your AI assistant to provide links and find websites...and there are tons of those, then meh, not a monopoly. Everything that I've seen, and been hearing, is that this will never happen. LLMs are essentially never going to be sophisticated enough to supersede search of actual human built items. On 11/21/2024 at 6:36 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: Rail ended the shipping "monopolies". Highways ended the rails. Breaking up standard oil did not improve the life of Americans. I mean yes it did lmao. Look at how many oil millionaires were created after its breakup. Look up how much production increased after its breakup. halfman, we've argued a lot. when you move to "and also monopolies aren't that bad" part of the argument, that's the best I"m gonna get On 11/21/2024 at 6:36 PM, halfmanhalfbronco said: AI assistants means less reliance on search engines. Just not shit we really need the government getting involved in. Innovation breaks up corporate centralized controll. It's a cycle. And a healthy one. I think you are crazy if you think this is true. 1
retrofade Posted November 22 Author Posted November 22 On 11/21/2024 at 9:38 PM, UtGrizfan said: As usual upset by facts with no argument, not surprising 🥱 What "facts" am I upset by? Your idiotic claim that you poor widdle conservatives are being treated unfairly by the DoJ? It's a pathetic and whiny point of view that isn't based in reality, just in what you want to believe because your fee fees get hurt. 1
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 8:08 AM, retrofade said: What "facts" am I upset by? Your idiotic claim that you poor widdle conservatives are being treated unfairly by the DoJ? It's a pathetic and whiny point of view that isn't based in reality, just in what you want to believe because your fee fees get hurt. I merely pointed out this administration is not and hasn't been friendly towards anyone MAGA (FEMA ordering agents to skip homes with Trump signs, weaponized 3 letter agencies, calling them Nazis, White Supremacists etc.) and you're ass gets triggered. Keep on crying, not my fault the truth upsets you so much 😂
retrofade Posted November 22 Author Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 12:18 PM, UtGrizfan said: I merely pointed out this administration is not and hasn't been friendly towards anyone MAGA (FEMA ordering agents to skip homes with Trump signs, weaponized 3 letter agencies, calling them Nazis, White Supremacists etc.) and you're ass gets triggered. Keep on crying, not my fault the truth upsets you so much 😂 First, please learn the differences between "your" and "you're" because they are entirely different words. Secondly, there was ONE FEMA employee who said that, and it was reportedly in response to your team threatening FEMA agents because y'all believe in crazy conspiracies more than you believe in facts. Finally, what "weaponized" three-letter agencies? Hell, the DoJ went after a sitting Democratic Senator, but you're whining that they unfairly target your MAGA ilk? Face it, you're a whiny little baby who believes everyone is out to get you because that's what Trump, Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Alex Jones, and all of the other crazies tell you. 1 1
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 1:36 PM, retrofade said: First, please learn the differences between "your" and "you're" because they are entirely different words. Secondly, there was ONE FEMA employee who said that, and it was reportedly in response to your team threatening FEMA agents because y'all believe in crazy conspiracies more than you believe in facts. Finally, what "weaponized" three-letter agencies? Hell, the DoJ went after a sitting Democratic Senator, but you're whining that they unfairly target your MAGA ilk? Face it, you're a whiny little baby who believes everyone is out to get you because that's what Trump, Fox, OAN, Newsmax, Alex Jones, and all of the other crazies tell you. Skipping 20 families is not just "one agent" and the fact they claimed people voting for Trump were domestic terrorists and could be ignored https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1859363368391627131?t=JLy7ZDAjU7pmrgl2SVBzcQ&s=19 Keep on justifying crap like this and crying, one of the many reasons the left got their ass kicked. Cope and seethe kiddo, facts > your crybaby feewings 1
retrofade Posted November 22 Author Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 12:49 PM, UtGrizfan said: Skipping 20 families is not just "one agent" and the fact they claimed people voting for Trump were domestic terrorists and could be ignored https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1859363368391627131?t=JLy7ZDAjU7pmrgl2SVBzcQ&s=19 Keep on justifying crap like this and crying, one of the many reasons the left got their ass kicked. Cope and seethe kiddo, facts > your crybaby feewings I'm not justifying things. You're acting as though it was a pervasive plot to mistreat MAGAland. It wasn't. I notice how you ignored everything else and focused on one thing that almost kinda sorta proves a point. You're way the fuck out of your league here, little man. 1 2
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 1:51 PM, retrofade said: I'm not justifying things. You're acting as though it was a pervasive plot to mistreat MAGAland. It wasn't. I notice how you ignored everything else and focused on one thing that almost kinda sorta proves a point. You're way the fuck out of your league here, little man. Big words from a shallow angry child, I've already stated several times I view multiple different sources (not just the Buzzword ones you like to use as a generalizing cop-out) but then again not surprising you lack reading comprehension. Maybe don't deep throat CNN and MSNBC? It's a fact this administration weaponized the law to target Trump, screeching "they went after one Democrat" to try and deflect doesnt change that. Anyone with a brain who isn't entrenched/biased in their camp could see it, including Independents like me and was one of the reasons Republicans swept everything. Once again, cope and seethe 1
retrofade Posted November 22 Author Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 12:57 PM, UtGrizfan said: Big words from a shallow angry child, I've already stated several times I view multiple different sources (not just the Buzzword ones you like to use as a generalizing cop-out) but then again not surprising you lack reading comprehension. Maybe don't deep throat CNN and MSNBC? It's a fact this administration weaponized the law to target Trump, screeching "they went after one Democrat" to try and deflect doesnt change that. Anyone with a brain who isn't entrenched/biased in their camp could see it, including Independents like me and was one of the reasons Republicans swept everything. Once again, cope and seethe I don't watch CNN or MSNBC, but thanks for playing, child. Nobody weaponized the law. Trump violated it and suffered the consequences. The parasocial relationship that you all have with someone that doesn't give two shits about you is beyond pathetic. The mere fact that you call yourself an independent while gobbling orange knob says everything there is to know about you.
UtGrizfan Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 2:00 PM, retrofade said: I don't watch CNN or MSNBC, but thanks for playing, child. Nobody weaponized the law. Trump violated it and suffered the consequences. The parasocial relationship that you all have with someone that doesn't give two shits about you is beyond pathetic. The mere fact that you call yourself an independent while gobbling orange knob says everything there is to know about you. Ah yes that's why almost everything is being or will be wiped out in appeals court on top of them literally changing laws in New York to go after him. You're full of it and I think you know it but you are just too stuck in your identity politics, or maybe you're just waiting for DNC leadership to tell you how to think again. You're right, I voted for Trump due to people like you and an Administration who are everything you claim Trump and his Supporters are. Cope and Seethe 1
halfmanhalfbronco Posted November 22 Posted November 22 On 11/22/2024 at 6:53 AM, happycamper said: haflman, they are and were such a monopoly, they were the only real avenue for web entertainment sites, and made the entire industry crash for their own reasons. That's' a monopoly. Everything that I've seen, and been hearing, is that this will never happen. LLMs are essentially never going to be sophisticated enough to supersede search of actual human built items. I mean yes it did lmao. Look at how many oil millionaires were created after its breakup. Look up how much production increased after its breakup. halfman, we've argued a lot. when you move to "and also monopolies aren't that bad" part of the argument, that's the best I"m gonna get I think you are crazy if you think this is true. Not a monopoly, and yeah, the government rarely needs to be involved in this stuff. Fuck, it's now been proven beyond any reasonable argument meta was never a monopoly and certainly is not one now. TikTok, Bluesky, X. Tons of competition for users to choose from. And nothing was ever stopping anybody from jumping back to myspace. Search engines are going to have to radically adapt to AI. https://www.cmswire.com/digital-experience/will-ai-powered-search-engines-ultimately-end-traditional-search/ It's always emerging tech that forces market changes. Usually for the better. And does a much better job than government. Go Big Tech!
halfmanhalfbronco Posted November 22 Posted November 22 Good read. https://itif.org/publications/2024/06/06/is-meta-monopoly-debunking-ftc-market-definition-metaphysics/
PackNation Posted November 23 Posted November 23 On 11/21/2024 at 7:51 PM, UtGrizfan said: An investigation literally cleared him, let alone by the Biden DOJ, unless all of a sudden you're going to say his DOJ is all of a sudden corrupt Would you be OK with Gaetz being alone with a female teenage relative of yours? 1
UtGrizfan Posted November 23 Posted November 23 On 11/22/2024 at 7:23 PM, PackNation said: Would you be OK with Gaetz being alone with a female teenage relative of yours? They all carry or know their way around firearms so yes, also the fact they're not prostitutes helps so they wouldn't be in that situation to begin with.
renoskier Posted November 23 Posted November 23 On 11/22/2024 at 7:47 PM, UtGrizfan said: They all carry or know their way around firearms so yes, also the fact they're not prostitutes helps so they wouldn't be in that situation to begin with. you're teenage relatives are "packing"? I call bullshit 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now