Trump’s Mandate

[Spaztecs]

On 11/7/2024 at 6:08 PM, HR_poke said:

No more 5G activating vaccines....

Damn.

There's goes the home wi-fi.

[SharkTanked]

Trump's Man...Date...

[InnZoneU]

On 11/7/2024 at 4:37 PM, Spaztecs said:

 

We can go back to the Roman method of rinsing our mouths with our morning pee. Whitens the teeth like the backlight on a white screen. The problem is it strips the enamel off your teeth and they rot out in your mouth. 

These folk yearn for the pre-flouride era to prevent falling prey to Communism. Fluoride softens the brain.

P.O.E.

Colonel Jack Ripper expounding on the subject.

 

Weirdos have been blaming fluoride a long time for everything under the sun.  Cancer, Depression, Lyme disease, autism....literally everything.  Then you get into super weirdos who think we are putting Endocrine in the water supply to turn kids ghey. 

Sounds pretty scary.

[Madmartigan]

On 11/7/2024 at 6:30 PM, PTR said:

Also helping to coordinate the grift between Jared and the Saudis. 

Nothing more American than the presidents family grifting from corrupt foreign governments. 

[Bison]

On 11/7/2024 at 12:35 PM, bornontheblue said:

First order of business is installing the Diet Coke Button on the resolute desk. 

More like McDonald's Diet Coke than the regular Diet Coke.

[Spaztecs]

On 11/8/2024 at 7:49 AM, InnZoneU said:

Weirdos have been blaming fluoride a long time for everything under the sun.  Cancer, Depression, Lyme disease, autism....literally everything.  Then you get into super weirdos who think we are putting Endocrine in the water supply to turn kids ghey. 

Sounds pretty scary.

Purity of Essence

[InnZoneU]

On 11/8/2024 at 11:40 AM, Spaztecs said:

Purity of Essence

The best part is that most people in certain areas (like LV e.g.) have been drinking treated wastewater for a very long time and don't even know it.  Everything that goes down yer drain and down yer turlets goes in the mixer in the wash then down to be treated at the facility and back into the drink (Lake Mead).

Science is great.

[4UNLV]

On 11/8/2024 at 6:49 AM, InnZoneU said:

Weirdos have been blaming fluoride a long time for everything under the sun.  Cancer, Depression, Lyme disease, autism....literally everything.  Then you get into super weirdos who think we are putting Endocrine in the water supply to turn kids ghey. 

Sounds pretty scary.

Yeah, like fluoride is the problem. 🤦‍♀️

[aztech]

I'm really getting sick about hearing Trump is going to do this or going to do that, before he even gets in office.  All that does is give him the attention he craves.  For shit sakes, hold off until Jan 20th. 

[azgreg]

19 days. Is that when the free eggs, gas & groceries kick in?

[CoachKenFTW]

On 11/7/2024 at 10:46 AM, Dogs4Me said:

What’s he going to do with it? Especially now that he doesn’t have to bother with opposing upper and lower chambers?

When does he start deporting democrats, I mean illegal aliens?

When does he implement his abortion ban?

Etc…

Lower corporate tax rate to somewhere between 15% and 0%

Sick the DOGE attack dog on Congress, Rs and Ds alike.

[AztecAlien]

On 11/9/2024 at 2:06 AM, 4UNLV said:

Yeah, like fluoride is the problem. 🤦‍♀️

You do realize that many cities in the U.S. like the very liberal Portland Oregon have rejected fluoridated water right? Portland has been doing it since the 60s. 

[Old_SD_Dude]

On 1/2/2025 at 12:22 PM, AztecAlien said:

You do realize that many cities in the U.S. like the very liberal Portland Oregon have rejected fluoridated water right? Portland has been doing it since the 60s. 

Fortunately in California the addition of fluoride is required for any water system serving more than 10k hookups. 

[AztecAlien]

On 1/2/2025 at 1:39 PM, Old_SD_Dude said:

Fortunately in California the addition of fluoride is required for any water system serving more than 10k hookups. 

Says you. Even today a toothbrush is pretty inexpensive. 

[InnZoneU]

On 1/2/2025 at 12:39 PM, Old_SD_Dude said:

Fortunately in California the addition of fluoride is required for any water system serving more than 10k hookups. 

As usual, the dumbfck has no idea what he is talking about.  This is true.

[AztecAlien]

Might want to do some research on the California cities with populations over 10K rejecting fluoridated water. And evidently, there's a bunch of dumbfcks in liberal parts of Oregon, including the state's largest city, and other cities across the U.S. 

[RSF]

On 1/2/2025 at 2:53 PM, AztecAlien said:

Might want to do some research on the California cities with populations over 10K rejecting fluoridated water. And evidently, there's a bunch of dumbfcks in liberal parts of Oregon, including the state's largest city, and other cities across the U.S. 

California law requires public water systems with at least 10,000 service connections to fluoridate their drinking water once funding is available: 

 

• Fluoridation: The process of adding fluoride to drinking water to prevent tooth decay
• Fluoride: A naturally occurring mineral found in surface water and groundwater
• Benefits: Fluoride stops or reverses tooth decay, and is endorsed by major health organizations
• Safety: The concentration of fluoride in community drinking water is 0.7 parts per million, which is not considered a health hazard

Here are some other facts about water fluoridation in California:

• The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) regulates fluoridation activities 
   
• Public water systems must obtain a permit from the State Board to fluoridate their water 
   
• Systems must monitor fluoride levels daily and report the information to the State Board 
   
• Some water districts fluoridated voluntarily before the 1995 law 
   
• Cities like Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego have voluntarily fluoridated since the 1995 law 

 

https://oralhealthsupport.ucsf.edu/sites/g/files/tkssra861/f/wysiwyg/Fluoridation Manual_Online_PDF_Version.pdf

 

The California Fluoridation Act of 19957 requires water systems with 10,000 or more service connections to fluoridate their water supply when funding becomes available from a source other than the rate payers or taxpayers. Further, California law states that it is the intent of the statewide legislation “to preempt local government regulations, ordinances, and initiatives that prohibit or restrict the fluoridation of drinking water.”

[Old_SD_Dude]

On 1/2/2025 at 1:18 PM, RSF said:

California law requires public water systems with at least 10,000 service connections to fluoridate their drinking water once funding is available: 

 

• Fluoridation: The process of adding fluoride to drinking water to prevent tooth decay
• Fluoride: A naturally occurring mineral found in surface water and groundwater
• Benefits: Fluoride stops or reverses tooth decay, and is endorsed by major health organizations
• Safety: The concentration of fluoride in community drinking water is 0.7 parts per million, which is not considered a health hazard

Here are some other facts about water fluoridation in California:

• The California State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) regulates fluoridation activities 
   
• Public water systems must obtain a permit from the State Board to fluoridate their water 
   
• Systems must monitor fluoride levels daily and report the information to the State Board 
   
• Some water districts fluoridated voluntarily before the 1995 law 
   
• Cities like Sacramento, Los Angeles, and San Diego have voluntarily fluoridated since the 1995 law 

 

https://oralhealthsupport.ucsf.edu/sites/g/files/tkssra861/f/wysiwyg/Fluoridation Manual_Online_PDF_Version.pdf

 

The California Fluoridation Act of 19957 requires water systems with 10,000 or more service connections to fluoridate their water supply when funding becomes available from a source other than the rate payers or taxpayers. Further, California law states that it is the intent of the statewide legislation “to preempt local government regulations, ordinances, and initiatives that prohibit or restrict the fluoridation of drinking water.”

You beat me to it. Here’s the text of the law. 
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/95-96/bill/asm/ab_0701-0750/ab_733_bill_951010_chaptered.html

[AztecAlien]

I was talking about liberal Portland Oregon rejecting fluoridated water since the 60s and evidently being a bunch of dumbfcks. But somehow we got to California. Here's the cities that tried to reject the law and fluoridated water. 

http://www.cleanwatersonomamarin.org/california/cal-communities_a-to-z/cal-communities-rejecting-fluoridation-a-to-z/

Clean Water Sonoma-Marin

CLEAN WATER IS FLUORIDE FREE

California Water Districts and Communities Rejecting Fluoridation: 1952 to the Present

CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER:

1952: Santa Rosa, Sonoma County – Rejected fluoridation (1952). 152 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

1990: Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County – On their own initiative, City of Morgan Hill water department employees stopped ordering fluoridation chemicals for the 17 groundwater wells that are the City’s exclusive source of water (3/7/1990).

1993: Redwood Valley County Water District, Mendocino County / Board rejected fluoridation (2/6/1993)

1997: Suisun City, Solano County – (5/01/1997)

1999: Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County – City Council passed a resolution (5 to 2) disagreeing with and rejecting the State’s recommendation to fluoridate (11/23/1999). 9 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

1999: Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County – City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting fluoridation without a vote of the people (1998), affirmed by Santa Cruz voters (3/2/1999). 12 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2001: Modesto, Stanislaus County – Unanimous vote of City Council following voter defeat of Measure M (11/7/2001).

2002: Redding, Shasta County – Signatures gathered against fluoridation qualified the proposal for council adoption or a general election ballot measure. City Council opted for the ballot measure in which fluoridation was defeated (11/5/2002). 76 on the fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2005: Mammoth Lakes, Mono County – Mammoth Lakes’ Safe Drinking Water Initiative passed with 72% of the vote (11/8/2005).

2008: Manila, Humboldt County – Advisory measure A, a proposal to fluoridate Manila water provided by Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District (HBMWD), was defeated 164 to 60 (2/2008).

2009: Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District, Humboldt County – After the 2008 Manila vote, the District stopped looking into whether or not it would be the regional provider for fluoridated water” (2009).

2010: Napa, Napa County – City Council unanimously rejected a grand jury recommendation that the city apply for grants to install fluoridation equipment in its three water treatment plants (8/17/2010). 17 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2012: Crescent City, Del Norte County – Ballot measure A passed with 56% of the vote (11/6/2012).

2013: Olivehurst Public Utility District, Yuba County – OPUD Board voted 3 to 2 to stop fluoridating its water (2/22/2013).

2013: Davis, Yolo County – 4 to 1 City Council vote (10/01/2013) / 136 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule.

2013: Cotati, Sonoma County – Unanimous City Council vote (11/12/2013).

2013: Hoopa Indian Reservation, Humboldt County – Unanimous vote of the Hoopa Tribal Council (11/21/2013)

2014: Sebastopol, Sonoma County /Unanimous City Council vote to oppose fluoridation (2/4/2014).

2015: City of Sonoma, Sonoma County / City Council voted 3 to 2 to oppose fluoridation (3/2/2015).

2015: Valley of the Moon Water District, Sonoma County – VOM Board unanimous approval of Agenda Consent Calendar Item authorizing the President to sign and send the fluoride opposition letter to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors (4/7/2015).

2015: Sonoma County Water Agency. The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors “postponed indefinitely” any consideration of the Sonoma County Department of Health Services (DHS) proposal to fluoridate Sonoma County water through the Sonoma County Water Agency (originally an item on the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors agenda 5/19/2015, item removed before the meeting). As of the 2016 elections, a majority of Sonoma County Supervisors is on the record opposing fluoridated tap water for Sonoma County. 

[Old_SD_Dude]

On 1/2/2025 at 1:32 PM, AztecAlien said:

I was talking about liberal Portland Oregon rejecting fluoridated water. But somehow we got to California. Here's the cities that tried to reject the law and fluoridated water. 

http://www.cleanwatersonomamarin.org/california/cal-communities_a-to-z/cal-communities-rejecting-fluoridation-a-to-z/

Clean Water Sonoma-Marin

CLEAN WATER IS FLUORIDE FREE

California Water Districts and Communities Rejecting Fluoridation: 1952 to the Present

CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER:

1952: Santa Rosa, Sonoma County – Rejected fluoridation (1952). 152 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

1990: Morgan Hill, Santa Clara County – On their own initiative, City of Morgan Hill water department employees stopped ordering fluoridation chemicals for the 17 groundwater wells that are the City’s exclusive source of water (3/7/1990).

1993: Redwood Valley County Water District, Mendocino County / Board rejected fluoridation (2/6/1993)

1997: Suisun City, Solano County – (5/01/1997)

1999: Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County – City Council passed a resolution (5 to 2) disagreeing with and rejecting the State’s recommendation to fluoridate (11/23/1999). 9 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

1999: Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County – City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting fluoridation without a vote of the people (1998), affirmed by Santa Cruz voters (3/2/1999). 12 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2001: Modesto, Stanislaus County – Unanimous vote of City Council following voter defeat of Measure M (11/7/2001).

2002: Redding, Shasta County – Signatures gathered against fluoridation qualified the proposal for council adoption or a general election ballot measure. City Council opted for the ballot measure in which fluoridation was defeated (11/5/2002). 76 on the fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2005: Mammoth Lakes, Mono County – Mammoth Lakes’ Safe Drinking Water Initiative passed with 72% of the vote (11/8/2005).

2008: Manila, Humboldt County – Advisory measure A, a proposal to fluoridate Manila water provided by Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District (HBMWD), was defeated 164 to 60 (2/2008).

2009: Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District, Humboldt County – After the 2008 Manila vote, the District stopped looking into whether or not it would be the regional provider for fluoridated water” (2009).

2010: Napa, Napa County – City Council unanimously rejected a grand jury recommendation that the city apply for grants to install fluoridation equipment in its three water treatment plants (8/17/2010). 17 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule. Charter City.

2012: Crescent City, Del Norte County – Ballot measure A passed with 56% of the vote (11/6/2012).

2013: Olivehurst Public Utility District, Yuba County – OPUD Board voted 3 to 2 to stop fluoridating its water (2/22/2013).

2013: Davis, Yolo County – 4 to 1 City Council vote (10/01/2013) / 136 on the CDPH fluoridation priority funding schedule.

2013: Cotati, Sonoma County – Unanimous City Council vote (11/12/2013).

2013: Hoopa Indian Reservation, Humboldt County – Unanimous vote of the Hoopa Tribal Council (11/21/2013)

2014: Sebastopol, Sonoma County /Unanimous City Council vote to oppose fluoridation (2/4/2014).

2015: City of Sonoma, Sonoma County / City Council voted 3 to 2 to oppose fluoridation (3/2/2015).

2015: Valley of the Moon Water District, Sonoma County – VOM Board unanimous approval of Agenda Consent Calendar Item authorizing the President to sign and send the fluoride opposition letter to the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors (4/7/2015).

2015: Sonoma County Water Agency. The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors “postponed indefinitely” any consideration of the Sonoma County Department of Health Services (DHS) proposal to fluoridate Sonoma County water through the Sonoma County Water Agency (originally an item on the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors agenda 5/19/2015, item removed before the meeting). As of the 2016 elections, a majority of Sonoma County Supervisors is on the record opposing fluoridated tap water for Sonoma County. 

Many of the water agencies you list have less than 10k hookups and are therefore exempt from the regulation.  I didn’t look at all of the remaining distrusts but several of them have since been fluoridated as state funding became available, as is required by the law.