Jump to content
WCSBoard

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/15/us/justice-roberts-trump-supreme-court.html
 

In addition to all of the scandals we’re aware of, such as Clarence Thomas accepting $4 million in bribes to cup the balls of billionaires, or justice Alito accepting similar bribes and flying flags in support of insurrectionists, we’ve got John Roberts, Mr. “balls and strikes,” clearly shoving the court in the direction of saving Donald Trump from himself.   


Remember the centrist trash bags who were trying to convince us that this is a “three, three, three“ court? What a crock of shit.  A Harris administration needs to expand the court to 14 justices and pass term limits. I’m sick of this shit.

Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 6:21 PM, Orange said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/15/us/justice-roberts-trump-supreme-court.html
 

In addition to all of the scandals we’re aware of, such as Clarence Thomas accepting $4 million in bribes to cup the balls of billionaires, or justice Alito accepting similar bribes and flying flags in support of insurrectionists, we’ve got John Roberts, Mr. “balls and strikes,” clearly shoving the court in the direction of saving Donald Trump from himself.   


Remember the centrist trash bags who were trying to convince us that this is a “three, three, three“ court? What a crock of shit.  A Harris administration needs to expand the court to 14 justices and pass term limits. I’m sick of this shit.

Requires an act of Congress, Justice Rage Monster. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 4:28 PM, RSF said:

Requires an act of Congress, Justice Rage Monster. 

No shit?   So fucking glad your dumb fucking ass arrived! 

Posted
On 9/24/2024 at 8:49 PM, Joe from Wyo said:

Clarence Thomas called me a wiseass in person once. Will always be one of the greatest things anyone’s ever said to me lol. 

that might be better than being called a degenerate by david duke lmao

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 9/26/2024 at 11:44 AM, Orange said:

Correct….?

I read the graphic wrong. I read it as expanding the number of judges to 15 to match the number of circuits. Carry on.

 

  • Cheers 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...