HLB Posted September 24, 2023 Posted September 24, 2023 Utah over Oregon State, 27-20 USC over Colorado, 51-10 Cal over ASU, 23-13 Oregon over Stanford, 56-9 Washington over Arizona, 53-17
Quack 12 Posted September 25, 2023 Posted September 25, 2023 You know very little about the Pac-12, even in its final iteration. Utah is going to have a hard time winning in Corvallis on a Friday night, with or without Rising. USC will beat Colorado, but I seriously doubt they're going to win by 41 points. The line is SC -21.5, but the Trojans' defense is looking worse than last year, and kickoff is at 9 a.m. PDT. I think the Buffs might cover. Cal is -12 versus ASU. I think the Bears win. Stanford might be the worst team in the league, but they consistently give Oregon fits, even when they're bad. I think the Cardinal cover the 27-point spread. The Dawgs do not like playing in the desert. I expect they'll win, but not by 36 points.
HLB Posted September 26, 2023 Author Posted September 26, 2023 On 9/25/2023 at 6:49 PM, Quack 12 said: You know very little about the Pac-12, even in its final iteration. Utah is going to have a hard time winning in Corvallis on a Friday night, with or without Rising. USC will beat Colorado, but I seriously doubt they're going to win by 41 points. The line is SC -21.5, but the Trojans' defense is looking worse than last year, and kickoff is at 9 a.m. PDT. I think the Buffs might cover. Cal is -12 versus ASU. I think the Bears win. Stanford might be the worst team in the league, but they consistently give Oregon fits, even when they're bad. I think the Cardinal cover the 27-point spread. The Dawgs do not like playing in the desert. I expect they'll win, but not by 36 points. I think my record on my picks, over the years, shows that I know more about the PAC12 than you are giving me credit for. That being said, my focus is on all of CFB, and because I'm not emotionally attached to the PAC12, I can see things better than those who are emotionally attached. Utah is the better team - with or without Rising. Only because of Rising's absence did I predict a Utah win of only 7 points. Oregon's betting line was lower last week, than USC's betting line this week. And how did that work out? Betting lines are only there to entice people to bet .... Colorado has talent at the skill positions, but not enough talent all the way around. And Colorado's defense is pretty porous, as we saw last week against Oregon. ASU is awful. Cal should easily win. Stanford might be the worst team in CFB. They lost at home to Sacramento State. And you expect them to give Oregon fits? The Dawgs are looking like the best team in the PAC12. They will win big over AZ.
Orange Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 On 9/26/2023 at 2:04 AM, HLB said: I think my record on my picks, over the years, shows that I know more about the PAC12 than you are giving me credit for. That being said, my focus is on all of CFB, and because I'm not emotionally attached to the PAC12, I can see things better than those who are emotionally attached. lol, no it fucking doesn't. You're lower-mid-tier at picking games AT BEST, and we all know why you bitch out and don't join the Pac-12 pick em. You'd get exposed. Tell us again how "Biden has no chance", Nostradumbass?
utenation Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 On 9/25/2023 at 5:49 PM, Quack 12 said: You know very little about the Pac-12, even in its final iteration. We've been telling him this for years. I think it was last year where he told everyone the P12 only had 10 teams. There are so many things to add to HLB's wall of shame from this board.
utenation Posted September 26, 2023 Posted September 26, 2023 On 9/26/2023 at 3:04 AM, HLB said: I think my record on my picks, over the years, shows that I know more about the PAC12 than you are giving me credit for. Umm, no, no it doesn't, your pick record is probably about 40% right. That's hot garbage.
HLB Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 On 9/26/2023 at 1:09 PM, utenation said: Umm, no, no it doesn't, your pick record is probably about 40% right. That's hot garbage. You're obviously not paying attention.
HLB Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 On 9/24/2023 at 3:51 PM, HLB said: Utah over Oregon State, 27-20 USC over Colorado, 51-10 Cal over ASU, 23-13 Oregon over Stanford, 56-9 Washington over Arizona, 53-17 Oregon State proved me wrong. Rising's absence caught up to Utah, who was lucky to get past Baylor, and had to rely on a pick-6 to get past UCLA. USC had the big lead, and then went to sleep. But they almost scored the 51 points I projected. Cal wins, as expected, but barely. Pretty close on the Oregon /Stanford score. UW is up 18, right now. I think it's going to get ugly, from this point on.
HLB Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 On 9/25/2023 at 6:49 PM, Quack 12 said: Stanford might be the worst team in the league, but they consistently give Oregon fits, even when they're bad. I think the Cardinal cover the 27-point spread. "I" don't know anything about PAC12 football? No one, on this planet, has to know anything about PAC12 football to know that Stanford wouldn't keep it close and cover the spread.
HLB Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 On 9/26/2023 at 1:09 PM, utenation said: Umm, no, no it doesn't, your pick record is probably about 40% right. That's hot garbage. I didn't make any picks in week one. In week 3 I said that everyone would win, except for ASU. I missed one pick, because Sacramento State beat Stanford, making me 9-2 for week 3. Picks from week 2, 4 and 5 registered a 17-5 record. Overall, 26-7, through 5 weeks, for 78%. You can go back to my picks throughout last year and find that those picks are correct at about this same percentage. And I typically don't go back, overlook the record, and post a "win" percentage. Simply put, it's not that big of a deal to me, I'm just trying to have fun. But it seems to be a big deal to you and @Orange, so I looked it up for the two of you.
Orange Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 On 9/30/2023 at 9:32 PM, HLB said: I didn't make any picks in week one. In week 3 I said that everyone would win, except for ASU. I missed one pick, because Sacramento State beat Stanford, making me 9-2 for week 3. Picks from week 2, 4 and 5 registered a 17-5 record. Overall, 26-7, through 5 weeks, for 78%. You can go back to my picks throughout last year and find that those picks are correct at about this same percentage. And I typically don't go back, overlook the record, and post a "win" percentage. Simply put, it's not that big of a deal to me, I'm just trying to have fun. But it seems to be a big deal to you and @Orange, so I looked it up for the two of you. Hey dickfuck, no one gives a single, solitary fuck about your picks until you start bragging about them, and then we use documented winning pctg from our pick em thread to prove that you're dead fucking last on this board in picking games. And then you whine and complain and pretend not to care about winning pctg after you wrongfully bragged about your winning percentage. Go fuck yourself.
Orange Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 On 9/30/2023 at 9:32 PM, HLB said: Overall, 26-7, through 5 weeks, for 78%. Good enough to be tied for 8th, drooling fuck.
Quack 12 Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 On 9/30/2023 at 9:19 PM, HLB said: "I" don't know anything about PAC12 football? No one, on this planet, has to know anything about PAC12 football to know that Stanford wouldn't keep it close and cover the spread. I wrote that Stanford "consistently gives Oregon fits," not that they do it every time. But yeah, I was being cautiously optimistic. You whiffed on Utah, you whiffed on USC (actually I think they were gassed, not asleep.) and you whiffed on UW. On 9/30/2023 at 9:16 PM, HLB said: UW is up 18, right now. I think it's going to get ugly, from this point on. It did, but not the way you predicted.
Orange Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 Stanford absolutely did give Oregon fits in the first half.
utenation Posted October 2, 2023 Posted October 2, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 8:48 AM, Orange said: Hey dickfuck, no one gives a single, solitary fuck about your picks until you start bragging about them, and then we use documented winning pctg from our pick em thread to prove that you're dead fucking last on this board in picking games. And then you whine and complain and pretend not to care about winning pctg after you wrongfully bragged about your winning percentage. Go fuck yourself. @HLB is a little drama queen. She loves to highlight her picks and claims she doesn't understand why everyone picks on her on this board. But follows that up with tagging the wolves to the slaughter. Not to mention, posts recaps of her picks. Who does that? "Look at Me, Look at Me" little drama girls.
Orange Posted October 3, 2023 Posted October 3, 2023 On 10/2/2023 at 2:39 PM, utenation said: @HLB is a little drama queen. She loves to highlight her picks and claims she doesn't understand why everyone picks on her on this board. But follows that up with tagging the wolves to the slaughter. Not to mention, posts recaps of her picks. Who does that? "Look at Me, Look at Me" little drama girls. What an insult to little girls, who in my experience have SOME semblance of self awareness.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.