Jump to content
WCSBoard

Cal = Best D in the Pac 10/12?


Guest Rough Riders

Recommended Posts

Guest Rough Riders
Posted

damn they looked good today vs UCLA, held them to 26 yards rushing.

Posted

damn they looked good today vs UCLA, held them to 26 yards rushing.

 

Ya, them and Arizona are both very solid on D this year...

 

Pendergast really had a nice game plan today! Of course ucla is'nt really known for passing this year, so loading up the box was definantley the best approach...

Guest LeaderofthePac
Posted

Even in Cal's loss to Arizona they held them to only 10 points and one big play all game. If their kicker had made that 40 yard field goal they'd probably be looked at as the #2 team in the conference right now.

Posted

Cal fan here. Very happy with the improvement shown by the D.

 

Still, DC Pendergast hasn't yet had to deal with a balanced top offense in conference. Arizona has a talented passing game but weak rushing; Ucla has a talented running game but weak passing. Actually, Nevada had a balanced offense (that night) and the Cal D looked horrendous.

 

SC has run well this year and is obviously passing out of their minds tonight. I hope they have a very emotional victory today in Palo Alto and experience letdown for next week. B) Other good offenses that have looked somewhat balanced so far are Stanfurd, Oregon, and sometimes Washington (our last 3 games, but all home games) and OSU in Corvallis is always tough.

 

So the Bears have a good D but that "Best D" talk is definitely premature.

Guest utenation
Posted

Utah was ranked 7th in scoring and total defense before we played ISU.. We gave up a few more points and yards than normal tonight but we should still be in the top 12-15 is my guess..

 

Cal was ranked 29th in scoring defense before tonight..

 

AZ was ranked 3rd..

Guest Rough Riders
Posted

Cal fan here. Very happy with the improvement shown by the D.

 

Still, DC Pendergast hasn't yet had to deal with a balanced top offense in conference. Arizona has a talented passing game but weak rushing; Ucla has a talented running game but weak passing. Actually, Nevada had a balanced offense (that night) and the Cal D looked horrendous.

 

SC has run well this year and is obviously passing out of their minds tonight. I hope they have a very emotional victory today in Palo Alto and experience letdown for next week. B) Other good offenses that have looked somewhat balanced so far are Stanfurd, Oregon, and sometimes Washington (our last 3 games, but all home games) and OSU in Corvallis is always tough.

 

So the Bears have a good D but that "Best D" talk is definitely premature.

 

i wouldnt say Zona is weak in the running game, they are pretty solid there actually with Grigsby and Antonlin.

Guest utenation
Posted

Updated numbers:

 

 

Scoring Defense:

 

AZ: 10th

Utah: 15th

Cal: 17th

 

Total Defense:

 

Cal: 8th

Utah:10th

AZ: 13th

 

 

 

 

 

BTW, top three offenses.

 

 

Total Offense:

 

Oregon 1st

Stanford: 16th

ASU: 23rd

 

Scoring Offense:

 

Oregon 1st

Utah: 3rd

Cal: 23rd

Posted

Utah was ranked 7th in scoring and total defense before we played ISU.. We gave up a few more points and yards than normal tonight but we should still be in the top 12-15 is my guess..

 

Cal was ranked 29th in scoring defense before tonight..

 

AZ was ranked 3rd..

After yesterday fwiw:

 

Utah: scoring def #15 (#2 in conference), total defense #10 (#2 in conf.).

AZ: scoring def #10 (#1 in Pac), total defense #13 (#2 in Pac)

Cal: scoring def #17 (#2 in Pac), total defense #8 (#1 in Pac)

 

i wouldnt say Zona is weak in the running game, they are pretty solid there actually with Grigsby and Antonlin.

Perhaps "weak" was not the best way to put it, but so far the 'Cats are ranked 92th in the nation and 8th in the Pac in Rushing Offense.

Posted

Updated numbers:

 

BTW, top three offenses.

 

Beat me to it, utenation.

 

The Bears' passing offense (or lack thereof) could be our downfall this year.

Guest beastute
Posted

Just imagine if we had a QB to go with Keenan Allen and our D. You'd think with a QB guru like Tedford he'd be a lot better.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...